Back to Evidence
Annual Literature Review

2022
in Review

Dr. Irshad’s selection of the most practice-changing publications from 2022, across foregut surgery, esophageal cancer, and lung cancer.

Reading as: the studies below can be shown in plain language or in full clinical detail.
2022
That year in medicineSurgeons performed the first transplant of a genetically modified pig heart into a person — a landmark moment for organ transplantation.
Benign Esophageal Surgery
Twenty years of data confirm reflux surgery provides lasting relief that medication alone often can’t match
Laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery for chronic GERD: systematic review and meta-analysis of 20-year data
Gut — 2022

Combining results from 28 studies and over 4,000 patients, researchers found that keyhole anti-reflux surgery gives lasting symptom relief in 80–90% of patients even after 10 years, with 60–70% able to stop taking daily acid medication for good. Very few patients (5–8%) needed another operation, and quality of life was notably better than for patients managed with medication alone.

A comprehensive meta-analysis of 28 studies and over 4,000 patients confirmed that laparoscopic fundoplication achieves durable symptom control in 80–90% of patients at 10 years, with 60–70% remaining off PPIs at long-term follow-up. Reoperation rates were low (5–8%) and quality of life scores significantly exceeded those of patients on continuous medical therapy.

Key takeawayAt 10 years, most surgical patients are still off antacid medication — surgery provides durable relief that pills cannot match.
For large hiatal hernias, choosing an experienced surgical team makes a real difference
Laparoscopic giant paraesophageal hernia repair: impact of surgical volume on outcomes
Surgical Endoscopy — 2022

Looking at national data on complex, large hiatal hernia repairs, researchers found that surgeons who perform more than 20 of these operations a year had far fewer complications: only 4% needed to switch to open surgery, compared to 14% for less experienced surgeons, along with shorter hospital stays and fewer major complications overall. This reinforces why complex hernia repairs are best done at high-volume centres.

A national database analysis demonstrated a strong inverse relationship between surgeon volume and morbidity in giant paraesophageal hernia repair — high-volume surgeons (>20 cases/year) had significantly lower conversion rates (4% vs. 14%), shorter hospital stays, and fewer major complications. The findings reinforced the importance of referral to experienced centres for complex hernia repair.

Key takeawayFor complex hernia surgery, volume matters — outcomes are dramatically better in high-volume hands.
Esophageal Cancer Surgery
Immunotherapy added to chemotherapy extends survival in advanced esophageal cancer
KEYNOTE-590: pembrolizumab + chemotherapy as first-line treatment for esophageal cancer — updated survival data
Annals of Oncology — 2022

In patients with advanced esophageal cancer, adding an immunotherapy drug (pembrolizumab) to standard chemotherapy extended median survival from about 10 months to 12.4 months. The benefit was largest in tumours with a specific marker (PD-L1), which is now tested for to help guide first-line treatment decisions.

Updated analysis of the KEYNOTE-590 trial confirmed that adding pembrolizumab (immunotherapy) to platinum-based chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival in advanced esophageal cancer (median OS 12.4 vs. 9.8 months; HR 0.73). The benefit was most pronounced in PD-L1 CPS ≥10 tumours, shaping the standard of care for patients presenting with unresectable or metastatic disease.

Key takeawayImmunotherapy has become standard in advanced esophageal cancer — understanding PD-L1 status now guides first-line treatment decisions.
A newer chemotherapy combination improves 5-year survival for cancer at the junction of the esophagus and stomach
FLOT4 trial: 5-year survival outcomes of perioperative FLOT vs. ECF/ECX chemotherapy for gastroesophageal cancer
Lancet Oncology — 2022

For cancer at the junction of the stomach and esophagus, a newer 4-drug chemotherapy combination (FLOT), given both before and after surgery, improved 5-year survival to 45%, compared to 36% with an older chemotherapy regimen. FLOT is now the standard chemotherapy approach at most high-volume centres for this type of cancer.

Five-year follow-up of the FLOT4 trial confirmed the survival advantage of perioperative FLOT chemotherapy (fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, docetaxel) over ECF/ECX for resectable gastroesophageal junction and gastric adenocarcinoma (5-year OS 45% vs. 36%). FLOT is now the standard perioperative regimen at most high-volume centres.

Key takeawayFLOT chemotherapy before and after surgery improves 5-year survival by 9 percentage points — a meaningful gain in a difficult cancer.
Lung Cancer Surgery
The original trial that made immunotherapy before lung cancer surgery the new standard of care
CheckMate 816: neoadjuvant nivolumab + chemotherapy before surgery for resectable NSCLC — primary results
New England Journal of Medicine — 2022

This landmark trial was the first to show that adding immunotherapy to chemotherapy before lung cancer surgery dramatically increased the chance of eliminating the tumour beforehand — 24% versus 2% — and extended the time before cancer returned. It established immunotherapy plus chemotherapy as the new standard treatment before surgery for many lung cancer patients.

The landmark CheckMate 816 phase III trial demonstrated that adding nivolumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery for stage IB–IIIA NSCLC significantly improved pathological complete response (24% vs. 2.2%) and event-free survival (31.6 vs. 20.8 months). The trial established immunotherapy + chemotherapy as the new standard pre-operative regimen for resectable lung cancer.

Key takeawayA landmark trial that changed practice globally: immunotherapy before lung cancer surgery is now standard of care.
At large scale, robotic lung surgery outperforms standard keyhole surgery on several safety measures
Robotic vs. VATS lobectomy for NSCLC: propensity-matched analysis of 8,000+ cases
Journal of Thoracic Oncology — 2022

Looking at over 8,000 lung cancer surgery patients nationally, researchers found that robotic lung removal had less than half the rate of needing to switch to open surgery compared to standard keyhole (VATS) surgery — 2.3% versus 5.1% — along with less blood loss and a shorter hospital stay, while survival and thoroughness of cancer removal were the same.

A propensity-matched analysis of 8,400 patients from a national thoracic surgery database found robotic lobectomy was associated with lower conversion rates to open thoracotomy (2.3% vs. 5.1%), reduced blood transfusion requirements, and shorter length of stay compared to VATS, with equivalent 30-day mortality and oncologic lymph node yield.

Key takeawayAt scale, robotic surgery is safer than VATS for lung resection — half the open conversion rate, less blood loss, shorter stay.